Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-04-21 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0993 HB 50 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN)(brf sup maj fld) An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date was read the second time. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0994 HB 50 Senator Parnell, Cochair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 986. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN) An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date (technical title change) was adopted and read the second time. Senators Hoffman, Adams, Lincoln, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 19, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 31,893,400 Insert 47,840,100 Under General Funds: Delete 31,893,400 Insert 47,840,100 Page 19, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 14,389,200 Insert 21,583,800 Page 19, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete 17,504,200 Insert 26,256,300 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Green objected. Senator Hoffman moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to withdraw Amendment No. 1. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senators Adams, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 2 : 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0995 HB 50 Page 20, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 6,364,500 Insert 19,184,500 Under Other Funds: Delete 6,043,400 Insert 18,884,400 Page 20, line 11: Under Allocations: Delete 4,180,000 Insert 17,000,000 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. Senators Ellis, Adams, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 3 : 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0996 HB 50 Page 46, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 465,097,200 Insert 475,097,200 Under General Funds: Delete 167,839,500 Insert 177,839,500 Page 46, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete -11,155,900 Insert -1,155,900 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Parnell objected. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to withdraw Amendment No. 3. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Parnell offered Amendment No. 4 : Page 10, lines 17-20: Delete Section 31. Senator Parnell moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 4 was adopted. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0997 HB 50 Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 5 : Page 30, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 18,415,000 Insert 20,571,900 Under General Funds: Delete 8,638,900 Insert 10,408,700 Under Other Funds: Delete 9,776,100 Insert 10,163,200 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Senator Torgerson objected. Senator Torgerson moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objections were heard and Senator Torgerson was required to vote. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0998 HB 50 Senators Lincoln, Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 6 : Page 37, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 7,180,700 Insert 8,907,100 Under General Funds: Delete 6,334,200 Insert 7,060,600 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Miller objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senators Elton, Ellis, Adams, Lincoln, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 7 : Page 16, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 35,672,300 Insert 36,264,900 Under General Funds: Delete 9,598,900 Insert 10,191,500 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 0999 HB 50 Page 16, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete -665,800 Insert -73,200 Page 18, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,326,800 Insert 4,454,100 Under General Funds: Delete 2,039,000 Insert 2,166,300 Page 18, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete -189,100 Insert -61,800 Page 19, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 6,211,200 Insert 6,235,700 Under General Funds: Delete 1,997,500 Insert 2,022,000 Page 19, line 13: Under Allocations: Delete -43,200 Insert -18,700 Page 20, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 123,338,900 Insert 124,441,100 Under General Funds: Delete 106,987,800 Insert 108,090,000 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1000 HB 50 Page 21, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete -1,177,700 Insert 75,500 Page 22, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,488,500 Insert 4,579,000 Under General Funds: Delete 2,093,000 Insert 2,183,500 Page 23, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete -208,200 Insert -117,700 Page 24, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,093,500 Insert 4,198,400 Under General Funds: Delete 969,300 Insert 1,074,200 Page 25, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete -266,600 Insert -161,700 Page 27, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,727,800 Insert 6,037,900 Under General Funds: Delete 1,734,800 Insert 2,044,900 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1001 HB 50 Page 27, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete -437,500 Insert -127,400 Page 28, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 8,291,700 Insert 8,441,700 Under General Funds: Delete 8,181,700 Insert 8,331,700 Page 28, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete -207,600 Insert -57,600 Page 33, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,204,900 Insert 6,207,500 Under General Funds: Delete 1,950,000 Insert 2,952,600 Page 33, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete -1,308,400 Insert -305,800 Page 34, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 44,104,700 Insert 44,176,600 Under General Funds: Delete 811,200 Insert 883,100 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1002 HB 50 Page 34, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete -86,700 Insert -14,800 Page 36, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,091,000 Insert 1,370,500 Under General Funds: Delete 537,700 Insert 817,100 Page 36, line 12: Under Allocations: Delete -345,900 Insert -66,500 Page 36, line 20: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,851,500 Insert 19,851,800 Under General Funds: Delete 5,533,900 Insert 5,570,200 Page 36, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete -232,900 Insert -196,600 Page 37, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,276,900 Insert 4,648,500 Under General Funds: Delete 1,599,300 Insert 1,970,900 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1003 HB 50 Page 37, line 12: Under Allocations: Delete -448,400 Insert -76,800 Page 40, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 10,285,800 Insert 10,943,100 Under General Funds: Delete 7,297,600 Insert 7,954,900 Page 40, line 33: Under Allocations: Delete -824,000 Insert -166,700 Page 41, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 2,403,900 Insert 2,458,400 Under General Funds: Delete 588,900 Insert 643,400 Page 41, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete -67,800 Insert -13,300 Page 42, line 6: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,192,400 Insert 16,377,000 Under General Funds: Delete 6,425,600 Insert 7,610,200 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1004 HB 50 Page 42, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete -1,296,900 Insert -112,300 Page 46, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 465,097,200 Insert 466,416,800 Under General Funds: Delete 167,839,500 Insert 169,159,100 Page 46, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete -11,155,900 Insert -9,836,300 Page 47, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 48,366,400 Insert 48,935,400 Under General Funds: Delete 48,066,400 Insert 48,635,400 Page 47, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete -659,400 Insert -90,400 Page 48, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,119,000 Insert 19,467,600 Under General Funds: Delete 19,054,000 Insert 19,402,600 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1005 HB 50 Page 48, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete -591,100 Insert -242,500 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. Senator Wilken objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 7 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 38, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 7,954,600 Insert 8,254,600 Under General Funds: Delete 3,562,700 Insert 3,862,700 Page 38, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 4,289,600 Insert 4,589,600 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1006 HB 50 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Senators Ellis, Adams, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 9 : Page 18, add a new line after line 13, Renters' Equivalency Rebate Under Appropriation Items: Insert 300,000 Under General Funds: Insert 300,000 Renumber following lines accordingly. Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Green objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1007 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Hoffman, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 10 : Page 40, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 33,413,300 Insert 34,503,300 Under General Funds: Delete 31,896,900 Insert 32,986,900 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Senator Miller objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1008 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Halford changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Ward changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 11 : Page 29, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 38,138,400 Insert 39,007,300 Under General Funds: Delete 25,831,800 Insert 26,700,700 Page 30, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 8,360,800 Insert 9,229,700 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1009 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Hoffman, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 12 : Page 39, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,863,400 Insert 16,172,900 Under General Funds: Delete 14,671,500 Insert 14,981,000 Page 39, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete 11,042,800 Insert 11,352,300 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1010 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 12 failed. Senator Parnell offered Amendment No. 13 : Department of Environmental Conservation Administration BRU Administrative Services Component Delete two Information Officer positions (126.1) GF (2.0) PFT These positions are paid for with an assortment of funds, but the total of the funds is $126.1 Senator Parnell moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Senator Parnell moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to withdraw Amendment No. 13. Senator Pete Kelly objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, it was so ordered. Senators Ellis, Adams, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 14 : 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1011 HB 50 Page 17, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,377,600 Insert 15,501,400 Under General Funds: Delete 7,377,300 Insert 7,501,100 Page 17, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete 296,800 Insert 420,600 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senators Hoffman, Adams, Ellis, Elton, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 15 : 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1012 HB 50 Page 26, line 13: Under General Funds: Delete 24,501,300 Insert 24,884,950 Under Other Funds: Delete 19,513,400 Insert 19,129,750 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Green objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 16 : Page 18, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,326,800 Insert 4,632,100 Under General Funds: Delete 2,039,000 Insert 2,344,300 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1013 HB 50 Page 18, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete 2,875,100 Insert 3,180,400 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 16. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 16 failed. Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Lincoln, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 17 : Page 25, line 6: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 12,526,700 Insert 12,856,700 Under Other Funds: Delete 6,775,500 Insert 7,105,500 Page 25, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete 3,481,200 Insert 3,811,200 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1014 HB 50 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 17. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 17 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Hoffman, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 18 : Page 40, line 5: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 7,498,000 Insert 7,740,500 Under General Funds: Delete 7,498,000 Insert 7,740,000 Page 40, line 7: Under Allocations: Delete 5,523,500 Insert 5,766,000 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 18. Senator Halford objected. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1015 HB 50 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 18 failed. Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 19 : Page 17, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 55,302,100 Insert 57,702,100 Under General Funds: Delete 55,302,100 Insert 55,702,100 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 19. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1016 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 19 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Elton offered Amendment No. 20 : Page 20, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 123,338,900 Insert 126,317,900 Under General Funds: Delete 106,987,800 Insert 109,966,800 Page 20, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 867,900 Insert 3,846,900 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 20. Senator Ward objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1017 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 20 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 21 : Page 20, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 123,338,900 Insert 123,909,000 Under General Funds: Delete 106,987,800 Insert 107,557,900 Page 21, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete 4,189,900 Insert 4,760,000 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 21. Senator Miller objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1018 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 21 failed. Senators Adams, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ellis, Elton offered Amendment No. 22 : Page 23, add a new line after line 12: Kotzebue Technical Center Operations Grant Under General Funds: Insert 634,000 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 22. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 22 failed. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1019 HB 50 Amendment No. 23 was not offered. Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Lincoln, Hoffman offered Amendment No. 24 : Amend Section 40 to read: *Sec. 40. TOBACCO CESSATION. The sum of ¦$1,400,000á $3,000,000 is appropriated from tobacco settlement funds to the Department of Health and Social Services for payment as a grant under AS 37.05.316 to the Alaska Tobacco Control Alliance for a tobacco cessation, prevention, and control program. Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 24. Senator Leman objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 24 failed. Senators Elton, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 25 : 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1020 HB 50 Page 32, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 71,990,500 Insert 73,357,000 Under General Funds: Delete 22,133,600 Insert 23,500,100 Page 32, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 729,700 Insert 2,096,200 Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 25. Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 25 failed. Senator Hoffman reoffered and moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1 (page 994). Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1021 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ward Nays: Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senator Ellis reoffered and moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3 (page 995). Senator Parnell objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ward, Wilken Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. Senator Parnell offered Amendment No. 26 : MOVE: Sec 44, Page 47, line 26 TO: Sec 44, Page 47 following line 21 and establish a new appropriation called Unallocated Reduction MOVE: Sec 44, Page 27, line 21 TO: Sec 44, Page 27, following line 23 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1022 HB 50 MOVE: Sec 44, Page 28, line 18 TO: Sec 44, Page 28 following line 25 and establish a new appropriation called Agencywide Reduction MOVE: Sec 44, Page 34, line 25 TO: Sec 44, Page 34 following line 26 MOVE: Sec 44, Page 48, line 15 TO: Sec 44, Page 48 following line 2 and establish a new appropriation called Unallocated Reduction Senator Parnell moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 26. Senator Adams objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 26 was adopted. Senator Parnell offered Amendment No. 27 : Page 16, Line 4 Delete: 2000, unless otherwise indicated. 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1023 HB 50 Insert: 2000, unless otherwise indicated. Notwithstanding the amounts otherwise set out in this section, the department-wide unallocated reductions based on travel and personal services authorizations may be applied to the general fund, general fund program receipts, general fund match or general fund mental health fund sources. Senator Parnell moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 27. Senator Elton objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 27 was adopted. Senator Pete Kelly offered Amendment No. 28 as amended: Page 25, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 3,338,100 Insert 2,838,100 This is an unallocated reduction. Senator Pete Kelly moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 28 as amended. Senator Adams objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 28 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1024 HB 50 SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 28 as amended YEAS: 13 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie and so, Amendment No. 28 as amended was adopted. Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN) am S was read the third time. The question being: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN) am S An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln 1999-04-21 Senate Journal Page 1025 HB 50 and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN) am S passed the Senate. Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Mackie moved that the constitutional budget reserve fund section (Article IX, Section 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska) be adopted. The question being: Shall the constitutional budget reserve fund section be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 50(FIN) am S Constitutional Budget Reserve Section YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln Torgerson changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, the constitutional budget reserve fund section was adopted. Senator Ellis gave notice of reconsideration on SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN) am S.